
ADVISORY NEIGHBORHOOD
COMMISSION 1B
Government of the District of Columbia
MINUTES
5 January 2006, True Reformer
Building, 1200 U Street NW
Attending:
Commissioners Moss, Spalding, Hunter, M. Smith, Stephens, Akinmboni, T.
Smith
Mathews
Absent: Commissioners
Hammonds, Wright
Quorum was achieved at approximately 7:15PM. Minutes of the December 2005 meeting were
moved by Secretary Spalding and adopted (7-0-0). Treasurer Stephens moved an amended report
for November showing an initial balance of $80,003.49, charges totaling
$284.99, and a resulting check book balance of $79,718.50. November amended Treasurer’s report was
seconded and adopted (7-0-0). Treasurer
Stephens presented the December report showing an initial balance of
$79,718.50, five checks totaling $3,192.03, and a resulting ending check book
balance of $76,526.47. The five checks
represent: CK1592 to Tim Stephens for $1,000, CK1591 to Phil Spalding for
$43.05, CK1590 to Phil Spalding for $238.98, CK1587 to Postmaster for $410.00,
and CK1589 to Metropolitan Music Ministry for $1,500. December Treasurer’s report was moved,
seconded and adopted (7-0-0). Treasurer
Stephens asked that the Commission consider the problems with reporting back on
grants issued, and asked that the Commission consider taking action at our
February meeting to aid compliance with the reporting regulations. Chairman Hunter moved that this item be
placed on the February agenda, and that Treasurer write to the delinquent
grantees asking that they comply or attend the next meeting with an
explanation, and it was seconded and adopted (7-0-0). Treasurer Stephens moved reimbursement of
Secretarial expenses for December in the amount of $23.16, and it was seconded
and adopted (7-0-0). Secretary Spalding
detailed the current status of the vacant seat in 1B07, and gave information on
the process for filling this vacancy on the Commission.
Chairman Hunter initiated the annual election of ANC
officers, and turned the gavel over to Vice Chairperson Moss. For Chairman Commissioner Hunter was
nominated and reelected to the Chairmanship on a vote of (7-0-1) with
Commissioner Mathews abstaining.
Chairman Hunter resumed the Chairmanship of the meeting and accepted
nominations for Vice Chairman, and Commissioner Moss was nominated and
reelected to her position on a vote of (8-0-0).
Commissioner Stephens was nominated for reelection to the position of
Treasurer, and he was reelected to his position on a vote of (8-0-0). Commissioner Spalding was nominated for
reelection to the position of Secretary, and he was reelected to his position
on a vote of (8-0-0). Commissioner Mike
Smith moved that the Commission elect Commissioner Thomas Smith to the
Executive Committee. Chairman Hunter
responded that this would require amending the Commission’s bylaws and was not
appropriate for discussion at this meeting.
Motion was seconded. After a
discussion of the difficulties of addressing this motion in terms of the
current bylaws Commissioner M. Smith withdrew his motion, and the Commission
members agreed to initiate a discussion in the next two weeks arguing the
merits of the suggested changes.
Treasurer Stephens moved participation in the bonding of
officers of ANC1B through the Advisory Neighborhood Commission Security Fund at
a cost of $25.00. Motion was seconded
and adopted (8-0-0).
In Community Events and Announcements Commissioner Moss
alerted everyone to a PBS/WETA series highlighting local communities with the
initial mini documentary featuring Shaw and LeDroit Park.
Flyers describing the series were
provided. Commissioner Stephens
described the Grow DC mini grant program and a series of meetings across the
city. Commissioner T. Smith described a
meeting on January 15th dealing with reparations for the slave
trade. James Speight III described the
celebrations honoring Rev. King later this month.
Chairman Hunter rearranged the agenda to hear presentations
located at the end of the printed agenda.
Anita Amero from Howard
University’s Center for
Urban Progress described lead poisoning prevention programs: DC Lead Safe
Babies, Lead Dust Wipe Testing, Lead Safe Painting Repairs and Remodeling. More information is available at 703-534-8334
or 202-865-8579. Ketan Gada from NCRC
gave an update on progress on the Radio One development.
Vice Chairperson Moss introduced review of Zoning Commission
case 05-17 the PUD (planned unit development) for Broadway Atlantic One
LLC. This is the second presentation to
the ANC on development proposed for the 9th and V Sts. area. Specifically tonight they will be presenting
a further development in coordination with DDOT on an east west cut
through. Architect Philip Esocoff
described the DDOT preference that Bryant
Street be extended west to a new traffic circle on
Florida Avenue. The Sparkle Car Wash property and another
small property have been added to the site, and in combination with the city
suggested traffic changes the configuration of our proposed building on this
location has changed to a V shaped building.
The proposed building south of V
Street has been stepped down in response to
comments from Office of Planning.
Allison Prince, land use counsel for the project, stated that the city
has asked for the developer to include design costs for the traffic realignment
as a part of its amenities package. This
will probably result in a cost of between $200,000 and $250,000, and it was
suggested by DDOT that this would expedite the process of accomplishing the
proposed roadway changes. Ms. Prince
also noted the 30,000 feet of affordable housing, which is the largest
affordable component included in a DC PUD to date. Ms. Prince also described the superior design
features provided by Mr. Esocoff, and in meetings with the LeDroit Park Civic
Association an historic signage program that is expected to be part of the
amenities package. Chairman Hunter asked
about the total number of units, and Mr. Esocoff responded that it is currently
632. Chairman Hunter asked the applicant
to describe the affordable component, and Ms. Prince responded that they will
be required to do a mix of different sized units and would probably result in
between thirty and forty units. Chairman
Hunter stated that this is a lot of units, and it is near a lot of other condo
units going on in that area. Ms. Prince
noted that they are not seeking any underlying zoning changes with the majority
of the development being built on underlying CR zoning. Commissioner Stephens asked about traffic
management infrastructure at the proposed new traffic circle, and applicant
responded that they are following DDOT’s proposal for the most efficient
addition of capacity and that the details were not yet designed. Commissioner Moss added that there had been a
number of public charettes to discuss the need for an east west passage, and to
explore the different possibilities for accomplishing this. Commissioner Moss added that she felt there
was still a need to completely flesh out the community benefits in the
amenities package. Commissioner Spalding
asked what the schedule of the Zoning Commission review of the PUD was, and Ms.
Prince responded that the hearing is scheduled for January 26th. Commissioner T. Smith asked about the
contribution to the transportation changes, and Ms. Prince responded that the
projected cost of the proposed changes is roughly 2.5 million, and the design
is expected to be approximately ten percent of the total, and that they would
be providing the design component.
Commissioner Moss asked about ongoing discussions with Howard University,
and Mr. Esocoff stated that it has been hard to get Howard officials to
concentrate on this project when they have been so involved in the hospital
planning. His discussion with Maybelle
Taylor Bennett, however, indicated that Howard was pleased with the designs to
date. At this
time the recording device failed to record approximately fifteen minutes of the
meeting. Motion was made to support the
proposed traffic reconfiguration, and it was seconded and adopted (8-0-0). Commissioner Spalding indicated his support
for this PUD citing its conformity with the DUKE plan and the Comprehensive
Plan calling for this type of development and density in this location. Commissioner Spalding also cited the superior
architectural design of the project, and reminded the Commission that this is
one of the specifically recommended amenities that the PUD process
specifies. Chairman Hunter voiced his
opposition to the PUD stating that the project is too large, and that we lose
any impact that we may have in the construction of a benefit package by voting
on this tonight. I think we should not
approve this until we’ve had time to negotiate more into the benefit
package. I am convinced we can get more
than has been offered in the affordable housing component. Commissioner Stephens asked if the Commission
to detail what we are specifically asking for from the developer in asking for
additional time. Chairman Hunter
responded that to conserve for our constituents the opportunity to have as much
input as possible, that we not approve this tonight. We should meet with this developer during the
period before our next meeting, and see if this is the best possible benefits
package we can get. I don’t think it is
an unreasonable request, and I think anything to the contrary is a problem, but
that’s just my opinion. Commissioner
Akinmboni stated that she did not know what this affordable component would
mean in terms of reaching low income people.
What is affordable for some people is not affordable for some people. Question was called, and Chairman Hunter
restated the motion as support for the current PUD package for Broadway
Atlantic One before the Zoning Commission, and a roll call was requested. Commissioners Moss, Spalding and Stephens voted
Yea. Commissioners Hunter, M. Smith,
Akinmboni, T. Smith, Mathews voted Nay.
The motion failed (3-5). Chairman
Hunter requested that Commissioner Moss work with the developer to schedule a
meeting to further discuss the details of the application prior to our next
meeting. Commissioner Spalding asked if
the Commission if they would like a letter drafted to the Zoning Commission
asking that consideration be delayed one month to accommodate further review by
ANC1B, and Chairman Hunter so moved, and it was seconded and adopted (7-1-0)
with Commissioner Stephens voting nay.
Commissioner Stephens introduced consideration of BZA 17417
for a special exception to allow construction of eight one family dwellings at 1425 Belmont Street. Commissioner Stephens stated that the
developer and architect have met with community groups and with him to review
the application. The exception is
required since the front entrances to the dwellings will be facing a side yard
as opposed to normal street facing. In
working with MHNA and others they have redesigned the building and the
architect Mr. William Morris will describe the changes and the zoning
request. Mr. Morris showed a board
illustrating the original design presented to BZA, and a representation of the
new design with two units reconfigured to face Belmont Street. This change represents input from the MHNA
meetings. The Belmont facing units will be brick faced and
much more in keeping with the context of materials on the block. All of the elevations are now to be brick
faced. Commissioner Stephens noted that
they are thirty-two bedrooms described in the project, but there are only four
parking spaces. This has singled out as
a concern by other nearby residents. The
design changes noted by Mr. Morris a directly responsive to comments from community
members, and the changes in the materials are much more suitable. What is the effect of this design on the
existing neighborhood, and the continued concern is the lack of parking. Commissioner T. Smith asked about the safety
concerns of the side entrances, and Mr. Morris described the lighting that
would be part of the design to illuminate the walkways on either side of the
building. Commissioner T. Smith asked if
they had given consideration of Zip Car incentives in lieu of the lack of
parking for the units, and the developer stated that they had not considered
this possibility but would explore it.
Commissioner M. Smith commended the developer for providing affordable
units and for their working with community and neighborhood groups. I do applaud the change to the front façade
design, however, I also am concerned with the effect of the limited parking
provided. Commissioner Stephens moved
that the Commission support the application for special exception, however, we
not support the design due to the inadequacy of the parking provided. Chairman Hunter cautioned Commissioner
Stephens that the application specifies its configuration and that the
Commission should either be supporting or opposing the application as it is
stated. Commissioner Stephens responded
that the community is not in support of the eight units with the limited
parking, however, they might support this type of configuration with fewer
units and more parking. Chairman Hunter
suggested that it might be better to oppose the application and then continue
to try to influence the design. Blaine
Asher, developer, responded that they have worked hard to incorporate changes
suggested by the neighbors, but was not sure that they could reconfigure the
design and keep it financially workable.
Mr. Asher added that there are thirty-two rooms that could be labeled
bedrooms, but they might not be used as bedrooms. Commissioner Stephens moved that ANC1B not
approve this application due to the inadequacy of the parking component, and it
was seconded. Chairman Hunter stated
that he would support the motion, but that the Commission has supported other
projects without extensive parking components.
Commissioner Spalding responded that he would be opposing the motion
since the application is specifically for relief from 410.13, and in the
underlying R5B zoning they actually comply with the regulations regarding
parking. In addressing the BZA we should
be addressing the specific issue presented in the application. I will argue the Commission’s position
however it decides to address the application, but it is difficult to argue
based on the current motion. Motion was
called, and a roll call requested.
Commissioners Hunter, M. Smith, Stephens, T. Smith and Mathews voting
Yea. Commissioners Moss, Spalding and
Akinmboni voting Nay. Motion is adopted
(5-3-0). Commissioners Stephens and
Spalding were designated to represent the Commission on this application before
BZA.
Commissioner Moss introduced consideration of HPRB
conceptual review of a new residential building at 1920 8th Street. The developer of this project is
Lakritz/Adler, and we have the architect Eric Colbert present to introduce the
design. Mr. Colbert originally designed
a building for this site that came before ANC1B, but that building was not
built and the new developers have asked for Mr. Colbert to redesign the
building accommodating input from the Office of Historic Preservation. Mr. Colbert described the location and
specifically detailed the quickly changing context of the neighborhood with the
numerous development projects currently planned. The HPO staff asked that we make the design
more contemporary, and that we step down the building on the southern side. HPO staff also asked that the front façade
feature more than the single bay featured in the previous design, and we have
added a second bay in the present design. The Commission reviewed the numerous
other projects surrounding this site.
Commissioner Spalding stated that he was on the Commission when the
original design was approved, and that the changes in design make the building
much more suitable for the site which is the transition point between the
larger density just to the north and the predominate row housing to the south
of the site. A community member stated
that she preferred that the designs be more in keeping the design elements of
the period reflected by the surrounding historic community. Commissioner Moss moved support of the
proposed design for 1920 8th
Street to HPRB, and that Commissioners Moss and
Spalding be designated to represent the Commission on this application, and it
was seconded and adopted (7-0-0).
Commissioner Spalding introduced DDOT Public Space
application by Robertson Development for the building currently under
construction at 2100 11th
Street. The
application is for a new driveway entrance to the underground parking, and also
the building entryways. The Beauregard
has already received ANC1B support, but this application is for two public
space issues tied to the design. Mr. Robertson
detailed the curb cut and driveway accessing the parking, and explained that
the curb cut is a relocation of the original curb cut for Jennings Auto
Garage. The second issue is the English
basement level below grade entryways featuring stairs at the corner, and a
handicapped ramp accessing from the 11th
street sidewalk.
As illustration of the type of entry you just need to look across V Street at the Lincoln condominium
building which features the same type of entry system. We are asking for a more expansive space at
the lower level which we feel is more appropriate for the size and scope of the
building. The handicapped ramp is
configured as a V, and better reflects the angled bays prominent on the 11th Street
façade. Commissioner Spalding asked
about the width of the sidewalk on the 11th St. façade, and Mr.
Robertson responded that they would not be encroaching on the current width of
the sidewalk, and that it would be consistent running along 11th Street. Ernest
Springs asked if the
project was in the historic district, and Commissioner Spalding responded that
it was not in the historic district.
Commissioner Spalding moved support before DDOT Public Space for the
curb cut, new driveway, and entryway designs for the Robertson Development
project located at 2100 11th
Street, and it was seconded and adopted (8-0-0).
Commissioner Stephens introduced consideration of a
projected land swap between DC Park and Recreation and NCRC on two parcels of
land located at 14th and Euclid Streets. This is a swap concerning the current Justice Park
located on the north side of Euclid. NCRC is assembling a parcel on the south side
of Euclid. They are proposing to swap parcels, and they
would rebuild the new park on the swapped site.
Commissioner Stephens moved that NCRC and DCPR present the plans once
the details are designed prior to the actual land swap to gather community
support. Commissioner Stephens explained
that we have no standing in this transaction, but asked Mr. Gada from NCRC if
he would accept this request. Motion was
seconded and adopted (6-0-2).
Commissioner Spalding introduced Board for the Condemnation
of Insanitary Buildings case 06-62. This
is a two story inside row house located at 2230.5 11th Street. I have tried to get more information on this
case, but the BCIB has not responded with any details yet, and I am asking the
Commission to delegate me to represent the Commission in hearings on this case,
and this motion was seconded and adopted (7-0-0).
Commissioner Spalding introduced consideration of DDOT 05-66
“extending the days and hours of the RPP” at specified locations. Commissioner Spalding noted that the
correspondence from DDOT was date stamped October 5th, however, I
just received this in the mail this week.
The locations specified are on Fairmont,
13th, and Harvard Streets.
There was general kvetching on the part of Commissioners on timely
notice. Commissioner Akinmboni stated
that these locations were in her smd.
Commissioner Stephens asked who had initiated the petitions to request
these changes. Commissioner Akinmboni
moved support of DDOT 05-66, and it was seconded and adopted (8-0).
Commissioner Spalding reviewed current status on ABRA
related cases. We are currently
negotiating with 11th
St. Market, we have had a second round of
mediation on the Duffy’s application, and we were accepted at roll call
hearings for protests of Carbonero and Yegnd applications in the 1900 block of 9th Street. We are awaiting a number of other roll call
hearings on protested licenses, and many of these should occur in January. Chairman Hunter added that the ANC1B petition
for reinstatement in the Duffy’s protest was successful, and that he had
participated in the second mediation session, and that he thinks we are making
some progress. There is a revised draft
voluntary agreement, and we are all working on it. The major concession is that Duffy’s has
agreed to remove the outside patio.
Everything else is still in play.
This is set for a protest hearing on the 25th of January which
I do not think will happen. We are set
for another mediation session on the 17th. Commissioner T. Smith asked if Duffy’s had
provided information on the sound proofing, and Chairman Hunter responded that
they had. Ernest Springs
asked for the status of Kili’s and the proposed moratorium, and Commissioner
Spalding responded that Kili’s was now out of business, and that the moratorium
was still in the development and discussion stages and not before ABRA.
Grant application for LeDroit Park Civic Association was
moved to the February agenda.
Commissioner Mathew introduced a grant application for the
Live Now Campaign. This is a campaign
for STD/AIDS awareness. Live Now is not
a 501C3, but in discussions with Treasurer Stephens we identified collaborating
partner Metro Teenage Youth as a suitable grantee. The request from ANC1B will support the
printing of brochures dealing with HIV awareness to be distributed at the
event. Justin Siplin, creator/ceo,
described the evolution of the idea for a fashion based aids awareness
campaign. We are planning an event at
Cramton Auditorium on March 23rd for an expected audience of 2000
college students. The event will be a
variety show with spoken word and music performances. Chairman Hunter stated that he has had
problems communicating with Live Now Campaign’s offices. I would like to support this grant, but that
our funding should be to Metro Teen Aids.
Treasurer Stephens indicated that in discussions prior to the meeting it
was learned that Live Now does not even have a banking account, so it does
appear more appropriate that Metro Teen be the responsible organization. Chairman Hunter proposed a motion that the
grant be approved conditioned on Metro Teen Aids as the responsible
organization, that the check be made to Metro Teen Aids, and that Metro Teen
Aids be responsible for meeting the financial reporting guidelines for ANC
grants. Treasurer Stephens requested
that a grant application be filed by Metro Teen Youth, and Chairman Hunter
agreed. Commissioner Mathews asked if
this meant they had to come before the Commission next month to represent, and
Chairman Hunter responded that they did not.
Commissioner Stephens noted that Mr. Siplin had stated that they had
received support from one of the Ward 5 ANC’s, and asked that details on this
support be provided to ANC1B. Treasurer
Stephens asked what amount was being requested, and Chairman Hunter replied
that it is for $1,000. Commissioner
Mathews moved support of the grant application including the stipulations
detailed in tonight’s discussion, and it was seconded and adopted (7-1-0) with
Commissioner Spalding opposing.
Chairman Hunter introduced a grant application for support
of the MLK Celebration Day Committee, and noted that the grant has been reduced
from $5,000 to $2,000. Kenny Barnes
described the history of the event as a member of the Board. This celebration has been produced for the
past twenty years and is staged on the Lincoln Theatre stage. Treasurer Stephens asked if the $2,000
reflected the joint participation of ROOT Foundation. We do currently have a guideline that
specifies a limit of one $1,000 grant per organization per year. This may affect the following grant from ROOT
as well. Mr. Barnes stated that ROOT is
not a part of this grant application.
Chairman Hunter asked if the MLK Celebration Committee was limited to
individuals, and Mr. Barnes responded that it was a Board. Treasurer Stephens asked if the Board of the
MLKCC was incorporated, and Mr. Barnes responded that it was his understanding
that they were a 501C3. Chairman Hunter moved
that ANC1B support the MLK Celebration Committee with the caveat that another
organization sign on as cosponsor.
Motion was seconded, and adopted (7-1-0) with Commissioner Spalding
opposing.
Chairman Hunter introduced a grant request for $2,000 for
Root/Noble “Guns Aside Month”. This
deals with gun violence in our community.
Mr. Kenny Barnes stated that the Council had just declared January “Guns
Aside Month” in honor of our campaign. We are planning a month of events culminating
at the Lincoln Theatre with two events on the 30th and 31st. One will be gathering youths from middle
schools and high schools across the city to attend a panel seminar forum at the
Theatre where we’ll be bringing in some rappers and record company executives
to speak to violence among our youth.
This doesn’t normally happen where youth can interact directly with
rappers. On the other evening we’ll be
having a Mayoral forum featuring all of the candidates for Mayor, and we’ll
have representatives from all of the high schools present and able to ask
questions of the candidates. Treasurer
Stephens asked if they had any support from any other city funds, and Mr.
Barnes stated that there were not.
Treasurer Stephens also asked for a fully detailed budget, since we
cannot support our funds going to some of the usual expenses of these events,
and Chairman Hunter supplied a fully detailed budget. Chairman Hunter moved support of the grant
application, and it was seconded and adopted (7-1-0) with Commissioner Spalding
opposing. Chairman Hunter moved that
ANC1B be an official sponsor of these two events, and it was seconded and
adopted (8-0).
Chairman Hunter brought up the issue forums that the
Commission has wanted to initiate. We
should pick a time to flush this out in detail.
After calendars were checked the 28th at 11AM was proposed as
a meeting date and time. Commissioner
Akinmboni suggested that the meeting take place in Faircliff East, and Chairman
Hunter responded that he would rather be closer to Starbucks coffee on U Street, and
Commissioner Akinmboni responded that she would make Chairman Hunter better
coffee and food at her location.
Meeting adjourned at approximately 9:45PM