![]()
ADVISORY
NEIGHBORHOOD COMMISSION 1B
Government
of the
Minutes
Thursday, November
4, 2010,
7:00 PM,
The regular
monthly meeting of Advisory Neighborhood Commission 1B occurred on Thursday, November
4, 2010, at 7:00 pm in the
Chairperson
Anderson Holness observed the presence of a quorum and called the meeting to
order at 7:00 PM.
Chairperson
Anderson Holness then made the following announcement:
ü We ask that you silence your cell
phones. By “silence” I mean either put
them on “silence” or turn them off if you are able. The vibration and rings interfere with our recording and we sometimes lose valuable
information.
ü Our meeting agenda is based on a
strict time frame. We want to address
all issues and assure participation by all interested parties, but we also want
to make sure that our meeting ends at a reasonable hour. Therefore, we ask that all presentations be
limited to five minutes. Mr. Jim Irwin,
our staff director, will give each presenter a three-minute and one-minute
warning, and then will announce the expiration of time. We request all those asking questions to be
as brief and concise as possible.
Community announcements at the end of the meeting are limited to two
minutes each.
ü This meeting is audio-recorded for the
public record and the draft minutes of the meeting, which will be published on
our website as soon as possible.
ü We welcome and encourage public
comment at appropriate points in the meeting.
Normally, we will ask for public comment on issues before the Commission
before any motion is offered for official action. Once a motion has been made and seconded,
comment and discussion is confined to Commissioners.
ü We ask that all those making
presentations, asking questions, or making comments speak loudly and clearly
for the benefit of our recording device.
Please state your name, residence address, and what organization you
represent. If you are representing
yourself as a resident, rather than an organization, please say so.
ü For the accuracy of our public
records, we ask that all those making presentations, asking questions, or
making comments complete the very brief speaker information form located on the
sign in table at the back of the room.
Please give the completed form to our Staff Director, Jim Irwin, either
before or after you speak to the Commission.
The purpose of this form is to assure correct spelling of your name in
the minutes, accurate address and accurate statement of representation.
Thank you for
your attendance, participation and cooperation.
.
Chairperson
Anderson Holness asked Commissioners to introduce themselves.
Chairperson
Anderson Holness commended and thanked Commissioners
whose service on the Commission was ending, including Commissioners Nadeau,
Akinmboni, Raia, and Ferrer.
Chairperson
Anderson Holness noted that several Commissioners-elect were present. She congratulated them and asked them to
introduce themselves. Lauren McKenzie,
elected to 1B09 and Tony Norman, elected to 1B10, were introduced.
Presentations
Chairperson
Anderson Holness introduced Ms. Sonia Gutierrez, Founder and Chief Executive
Officer of the
Ms. Gutierrez
briefly reviewed the history of the school and noted that they had received the
support of ANC 1B in 2002 when they were beginning the renovation of the building
they now occupy at 11th and Harvard Streets N.W.
Ms. Gutierrez
introduced staff members who accompanied her.
Their presentation reviewed the curriculum and extensive academic
accomplishments of the school.
The
discussion included the school’s efforts to work with neighbors to ease
problems related to parking, noise and traffic.
Public Safety and Public Safety
Committee Report
Commissioner
Muhammad presented the Public Safety Committee report, which was accepted for
information purposes and is entered into the minutes below.
PUBLIC
SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT
November
4, 2010
Commissioner Sedrick Muhammad, Chairperson
Commissioners,
Below is a summary of some public safety reports that took place
between October 7 and today. First is a brief summary from DC FEMS
followed by MPD's PSA 304 & 305 30 Day Crime Stat report, respectively.
October 15
October 20
DC FEMS reported a Motor Vehicle Collision at Vermont Av & U
St NW -
October 22
DC FEMS reported a cyclist
struck on 1500 blk
October 27
DC FEMS reported a cyclist struck at
October 28
DC FEMS reported a tech rescue due to a car crashing into
bldg on the 1300 block of
October 29
DC FEMS reported a pedestrian struck at 15th &
DC FEMS reported a pedestrian struck on the 2400 block of
November 2
DC FEMS reported a fire on the 700 block of
DC FEMS reported a fire at
Today
DC FEMS reported 2 hours ago there was a small fire at
MPD PSA 304
|
Crime Type |
10/7/2009 to 11/3/2009 |
10/07/2010 to 11/03/2010 |
% Change |
||
|
Homicide |
0 |
N/A |
|||
|
Sex Abuse |
1 |
|
|||
|
Robbery Excluding Gun |
0 |
N/A |
|||
|
Robbery With Gun |
1 |
No Change |
|||
|
Assault Dangerous Weapon (ADW) Excluding Gun |
3 |
|
|||
|
Assault Dangerous Weapon (ADW) Gun |
1 |
|
|||
|
Total Violent Crime |
6 |
12 [view map] |
|
||
|
Burglary |
5 |
|
|||
|
Theft |
5 |
No Change |
|||
|
Theft F/Auto |
13 |
19 [view map] |
|
||
|
Stolen Auto |
6 |
|
|||
|
Arson |
0 |
N/A |
|||
|
Total Property Crime |
29 |
32 [view map] |
|
||
|
Total Crime |
35 |
44 [view map] |
|
MPD PSA 305
|
Crime Type |
10/7/2009 to 11/3/2009 |
10/07/2010 to 11/03/2010 |
% Change |
||
|
Homicide |
0 |
N/A |
|||
|
Sex Abuse |
0 |
N/A |
|||
|
Robbery Excluding Gun |
4 |
14 [view map] |
|
||
|
Robbery With Gun |
6 |
|
|||
|
Assault Dangerous Weapon (ADW) Excluding Gun |
5 |
|
|||
|
Assault Dangerous Weapon (ADW) Gun |
2 |
|
|||
|
Total Violent Crime |
17 |
19 [view map] |
|
||
|
Burglary |
4 |
|
|||
|
Theft |
19 |
18 [view map] |
|
||
|
Theft F/Auto |
26 |
43 [view map] |
|
||
|
Stolen Auto |
3 |
|
|||
|
Arson |
0 |
N/A |
|||
|
Total Property Crime |
52 |
74 [view map] |
|
||
|
Total Crime |
69 |
93 [view map] |
|
Commissioner Sedrick Muhammad
ANC 1BO3
Chairman, ANC 1B Public Safety Committee
Commissioner
Moss added to Commissioner Muhammad’s report by noting that she was meeting
with Councilmember Graham, Assistant Police Chief Dianne Groomes, and Commander
Kishter of the Third District, regarding the tragedy at DC 9 on
Commissioner
Raia asked the community to be alert and watchful, as the assaults mentioned by
Commissioner Moss were carried out by young men targeting the gay and lesbian
community. Citizens reporting such
crimes should be sure to identify them as hate crimes.
Commissioner
Moss said that the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) and the Department of
Consumer and Regulatory Affairs (DCRA) had been very helpful in dealing with a
problem house in her single-member district (SMD) on
Officers Reports
Secretary’s Report – Minutes of
September 2010 meeting
Commissioner
Moss submitted the draft minutes of the October, 2010 meeting for approval.
Commissioner
Moss moved that the draft minutes of the October 7, 2010 meeting be approved.
Commissioner
Lopez seconded the motion.
The motion
was adopted unanimously, 7 yes 0 no, 1 abstain.
Commissioner Nadeau abstained.
Treasurer’s Report
Chairperson
Anderson Holness noted that Commissioner Ferrer, Treasurer, was necessarily
absent due to illness. She presented the
Treasurer’s Report:
The
October, 2010 Industrial Bank Statement is attached to this report.
The current balance is $35,262.69.
The following
checks were written at the October 7, 2010 meeting:
|
Name |
Check # |
Amount |
Purpose |
|
|
1784 |
$107.59 |
Federal
payroll taxes &withholding |
|
|
1785 |
$392.60 |
Federal
payroll taxes &withholding |
|
|
1786 |
$725.97 |
Federal
payroll taxes &withholding |
|
|
1787 |
$938.12 |
Federal
payroll taxes &withholding |
|
|
1788 |
$1,158.59 |
Federal
payroll taxes &withholding |
|
|
1789 |
$1,249.74 |
Federal
payroll taxes &withholding |
|
UPS Store |
1790 |
$108.75 |
Printing
– meeting announcement flyers & brochures |
|
Best Buy |
1791 |
$298.84 |
Computer
audio speakers and IT support services |
|
James Irwin |
1792 |
$1,405.92 |
Staff
wages |
|
James Irwin |
1793 |
$8.80 |
Reimbursement
for postage |
|
Emergence Community Arts Collective |
1794 |
$2,000.00 |
Grant
#10-16 |
The following
checks were cashed last month:
|
Date
Cashed |
Name |
Check # |
Amount |
Purpose |
Meeting
Approval Date |
|
10/12/10 |
James Irwin |
1792 |
$1,405.92 |
Staff wages |
Budget approved
10/1/09 |
|
10/12/10 |
James Irwin |
1793 |
$8.80 |
Reimbursement for postage |
10/7/10 |
|
10/25/10 |
Emergence Community
Arts Collective |
1794 |
$2,000.00 |
Grant #10-16 |
10/7/10 |
|
Name |
Amount |
Purpose |
|
James Irwin |
$1,292.80 |
Staff
wages-net pay |
|
James Irwin |
$35.97 |
Reimbursement
for web hosting fees |
|
Capital Services & Supplies |
$401.57 |
Office
supplies, including invoice dated 8/5/10 not paid |
Commissioner
Raia moved that expenses be approved as stated in the report. Commissioner Muhammad seconded the motion.
Commissioner
Lopez asked about the 8/5/10 invoice.
Jim Irwin, Staff Director, said that the invoice had arrived shortly
after the August meeting, should have been approved at the September meeting,
but was overlooked. The expense was
purchase of printer cartridges and classified as office supplies.
The motion
was adopted unanimously, 8 yes, 0 no.
Design Review Applications and Design
Review Committee Report
Mr. Tony
Norman, Chairperson of the Committee, presented the Committee report:
ADVISORY
NEIGHBORHOOD COMMISSION 1B
DESIGN
REVIEW COMMITTEE
Tony Norman,
Chairperson
Report and
Recommendations
November 4, 2010
The
Design Review Committee met at the
Others
present were: Matt Sislen, Dantes
Partners, Jordan Bishop, Dantes Partners, Buwa Binte, Dantes Partners, Paul
Milstein, Douglas Development Corporation, Carolyn Brown, Holland & Knight
law firm, Lee Rubenstein, R2L Architects, Sasha Rosen, R2L Architects
SUMMARY
The
Committee reviewed two projects: the
Dantes
Partners gave the Committee an update on the status of the
The
developers of
RECOMMENDATION
Mr.
Joel Heisey moved that the Committee recommend that ANC 1B support Douglas
Development’s conceptual design for
Mr.
Patrick Nelson seconded the motion.
The
motion was adopted unanimously, 6 yes, 0 no.
REPORT ON RECOMMENDATION
·
The Committee has previously reviewed this project
and received an update on the current status of the design concept for the
project.
·
The location of the project,
·
This project will provide work-force targeted
rental apartments, available to people making between $40,000 and $60,000
annual income. This is intended to
address the shortage of affordable housing in
·
Chairperson Norman noted that the Committee had
previously voted to support the concept of workforce housing on the
·
Tenant selection will begin when the project is
about three months away from completion.
Criteria for selection are established by District and Federal laws,
including the Fair Housing Act, Section 3 requirements, low-income
housing tax credit requirements set by the federal government, which sets an
income threshold. To qualify, a tenant
may not be able to make more than $60,000.
The specific restrictions and criteria will depend upon the type(s) of
financing the developer can acquire.
·
The site has
been awarded to Dantes Partners. What
this means is that the developer has the right to exclusively negotiate with
the city. If the city and the developer
cannot come to agreement within 90 days, the developer can withdraw and the
city can transfer the site to another party or retain it.
·
The land is being leased by the city to the
developer. The developer will own the
building which will be constructed, but the city will continue to own the
land. The term of the lease is currently
being negotiated. It could be as much as
99 years.
·
Regarding lease payments, the developer proposes to
make a cash payment to the District, a cash and/or in-kind payment to support
the garden that will be established directly across the street from the
site. Cash lease payments will be based
on a percentage of the operating profits of the building.
·
The next step is the negotiation of a term sheet,
which transfers what the developer offered to the city for the development of
the site into a legal statement of terms about 13 pages long. The term sheet forms the basis for the next
step, a Land Development and Disposition Agreement (LDDA), about 60 pages long. Negotiation of the term sheet has been
completed and is awaiting the Mayor’s approval.
A public hearing has been scheduled for November 8th. They are currently negotiating the LDDA. This will be relatively straightforward
because the project is a multi-unit residential building, with no mixed uses
included. The actual design of the
building does not have to be specified in the LDDA.
·
The actual design of the building will be
determined after public input through a series of charettes.
·
The tentative plan is to design a building with
somewhere between 28 and 39 units. There
will be a combination of studios, one-bedroom and two-bedroom apartments. The actual mix will depend on public feedback
and design considerations.
·
If all goes well and financing is secured, they
hope to break ground by October, 2011.
·
The public hearing is required by D.C. Law to give
notice to the public that a publicly-owned asset is being disposed of. It will give the community an opportunity to
ask the developer questions and engage in discussion about the conceptual
design of the project. It also provides
an opportunity for someone to contest the sale of the property to the
developer.
·
When negotiation of the LDDA is completed, it will
go to the City Council for approval. Public
hearings will be held by Councilmember Cheh’s Committee on Government
Operations and Councilmember Kwame Brown’s Committee on Economic
Development. This provides another
opportunity for the public to comment on the project and express their needs
and concerns. They hope that these
Council hearings can be completed before the end of 2010.
·
Neighbors of the project have expressed concern
about setbacks and close proximity to the site, the fact that the range of the
target market is low to moderate income, aesthetics of the building, the
building being rental vs. homeownership.
These are issues that can be negotiated.
·
Dantes
Partners wants to make clear to the community that they will not compromise on
aesthetics or architectural design. They
want this project to be a landmark building.
·
The location of the project is the southeast corner
of
View 14 is directly north across
·
The project will be a multi-unit residential building,
market rate, with 8% of the units affordable
housing. They will be seeking some
zoning relief.
·
They are in the very early stages of the project,
but wanted to inform the community and the ANC and begin getting input from
them.
·
The
developer is seeking the Commission’s support for their design review concept.
·
They have presented their concept to the Meridian
Hill Neighborhood Association.
·
The
property is located in the Greater U Street Historic District and the applicant
is seeking design review before the Historic Preservation Review Board.
·
They have met with the Office of Planning and the
Historic Preservation Office to get their input. Their current design reflects the comments of
these offices.
·
The
new building will be 75 feet in height and contain approximately 26,044 square feet
of residential use and 2.500 square feet of commercial retail/service
uses.
·
The
exterior of the building will be clad in brick, with glass and brick projecting
bays on the
·
The
site is 5,530 square feet, so it is quite tight and they are trying to do as
much as possible with the space.
·
There
will be underground parking for ten cars and bicycles. Access to the parking garage will be by ramp
from the alley off of
·
The
project will include 30 residential units.
Current zoning requires one parking space for every two units, but it is
impossible to provide 15 parking spaces in the space available. They will therefore be seeking a zoning
variance to permit ten instead of 15 spaces.
·
They
propose retail use for the ground floor space.
They are studying how to make the retail most useful for the community.
·
Each
floor includes five one-bedroom apartments ranging from 600 square feet to 720
square feet and one efficiency unit at 400 square feet.
·
The
building is LEED designed.
·
Current
zoning is C3
·
There
are zoning and building code issues that the Committee will review at later
meetings. Action at this meeting focused
on the question of historic preservation review.
Mr. Norman noted that the project would be seeking zoning
variances and special exceptions, and would be coming before the Committee and
the Commission again for support for those applications, but the action item
for this meeting was a request for support for the design concept before the
Historic Preservation Review Board.
Commissioner Thomas noted that the project was located in
her district, but she had not been informed of it.
Mr. Norman said that the Committee had specifically asked
that Commissioner Thomas be contacted regarding the project.
Chairperson Anderson Holness emphasized the policy of the
commission that all projects be reviewed by the commissioner representing the
SMD in which the project was located and the civic or neighborhood associations
in the area. It was very important to
contact the commissioner of jurisdiction so that commissioners did not come to
the meeting and only then find out about projects going on in their districts. The Commission relied on the recommendations
and advice of that commissioner regarding a proposed project. She asked the developer of
Mr. Sasha Rosen, architect for the project, said that
they had sent e-mails and attempted to contact Commissioner Thomas after the
committee meeting.
Commissioner Thomas said that she had not received any
e-mail about the project and always responded to e-mails. She also said that Commissioner Nadeau’s SMD
bordered hers and the project was just across the district boundary, so
Commissioner Nadeau should be involved as well.
Commissioner Nadeau commented that the Meridian Hill
Neighborhood Association (MHNA) would want to be involved.
Mr. Rosen said that they had presented their project to
MHNA in October.
Chairperson Anderson Holness asked Mr. Rosen to meet with
Commissioners Thomas and Nadeau.
Mr. Norman said that the developer was seeking support
for the design concept from the Commission because they had a hearing before
the Historic Preservation Board later in November. He suggested that Mr. Rosen present his
project to the Commission.
Mr. Rosen made a brief presentation that essentially
repeated the points made in the Design Review Committee report above.
Commissioner Nadeau asked about the size of the parking
garage and the reason for not constructing more than one parking level.
Mr. Rosen said that the issue was not money or
obstructions that would prevent digging deeper.
The problem was that the size of the lot and therefore the size of the
basement precluded the clearance necessary to construct another ramp to a lower
level. It would be impossible to make
the turn and get a car down the ramp.
Commissioner Nadeau asked about the number of parking
spaces for bicycles in the underground garage.
Mr. Rosen said they had room in the garage for fifteen
bicycles. The District Department of
Transportation had requested four bicycle spaces outside, so four spaces would
be provided near the entrance to the building.
Mr. Rosen said, in response to questions from Commissioner Nadeau, that there
would be 30 units in the building, they would be rental units, and rents would
be market rate.
Chairperson Anderson Holness asked what the rates would
be.
Mr. Rosen said the rents would be approximately
$2,000-$2,400 per month for a one-bedroom apartment. He said ten percent of the units, or three,
would be affordable housing.
Commissioner Nadeau asked what trash removal plan would
be in place if a restaurant opened in the retail space on the ground floor.
Mr. Rosen said this was one of the toughest issues they
were working on. Because of the
configuration of the lot and the building, the location of the elevator and the
entrance to the residential units is fixed and cannot be adjusted. This means that the best locations for trash
storage are taken up by other functions.
They are currently working on how to locate trash storage and collection
on the alley.
Chairperson Anderson Holness asked if D.C. residents
would be hired to work on the project.
Mr. Rosen said that Douglas Development was strongly
committed to hiring residents, but he did not know if an agreement had been
finalized.
Chairperson Anderson Holness and Commissioner Thomas
warned that the project would be shut down if local residents were not
employed.
Commissioner Nadeau asked about the construction
schedule.
Mr. Rosen said they hoped to begin construction on July
1, 2011. They estimated the project
would take 12 months to complete.
Commissioner Thomas noted that there were two schools
located immediately adjacent to the project and suggested that the developer
had consulted with them about safety issues related to traffic in and out of
the alley. Children from the schools
would be crossing the alley at various times of the day.
Commissioner Thomas also asked about the mural on the
side wall of the property and what would be done to replace it.
Mr. Rosen said they had spoken to the artist who created
the original mural and asked him whether he wanted to recreate the original
mural, move it to a different location, or create a new mural. He would like to create a new mural. He will some to the community with some ideas
and will get feedback from the community.
Commissioner Moss asked about plans for the rooftop of
the building.
Mr. Rosen said the rooftop would be green-designed and
would be restricted to residents due to the limited space and size of the
building. There will not be a concierge
at the entrance, so control of who enters the building is limited.
Commissioner Moss asked if local small businesses were
being considered for the retail space.
Mr. Rosen said he did not know of any specific
agreements, but he knew the developer was a local business and was committed to
supporting and bringing in local businesses.
Commissioner Raia said that, if a restaurant was
established in the retail space, consideration should be given to how to keep
the area quiet for the residents and the neighbors.
Mr. Norman noted that the only thing the Committee had
reviewed and approved was the design concept with reference to historic
preservation concerns. Other issues such
as zoning or parking would be reviewed at another meeting. The developer did need approval for the
design concept at this meeting.
Commissioner Nadeau asked Mr. Rosen to provide the
timeline for all approvals they would need.
Mr. Rosen said review by the Historic Preservation Review
Board would be on November 15. Review by
the Board of Zoning Adjustment would likely be toward the end of January; they
did not have a hearing date yet. He
hoped that he and Commissioners Nadeau and Thomas could meet in November.
Commissioner Nadeau moved that ANC 1B support the design
concept proposed for
Commissioner Muhammad seconded the motion.
The motion was adopted unanimously, 8 yes, 0 no.
Commissioner Nadeau observed to Mr. Rosen that Mr. Jamal
had a history of being less than direct with the Commission on development
projects, and the Commission needed for him to show up and be involved in the
further review and discussions about the
Liquor Licenses and ABC Committee
Report
Commissioner
Raia said there was no Committee report.
Martin’s Restaurant
and Lounge,
Commissioner
Moss reviewed the application for a new Class C Tavern license for Martin’s
Restaurant and Lounge. She said this is
a sensitive location, as the previous owner had leased out his establishment to
another party and ceded control over its operation. A young woman had been killed there and the
establishment had been shut down. She
has visited the new restaurant and met with the owner. They are in the process of negotiating a
voluntary agreement with the community and the Commission. However, the owner was not present at this
meeting and had not yet met with Commissioner Raia, chairperson of the ABC
Committee, or with the
For these
reasons, Commissioner Moss moved that ANC 1B protest the application of Martins
Restaurant and Lounge for a new Retail Class C Tavern License on the basis of
concerns related to peace, order, quiet and parking.
Commissioner
Muhammad seconded the motion.
The motion
was adopted unanimously, 8 yes, 0 no.
Pica Taco, 1406 Florida Avenue N.W. –
application for new Retail Class D Restaurant License
Commissioner
Thomas said that this applicant has met with the Meridian Hill Neighborhood
Association, residents of Union Row and other residents with concerns. No one seemed to have any major concerns. This is a very small establishment with
seating capacity of 14.
The owner,
Ms. Maria Villatta, spoke briefly to the Commission and said that she had a
petition of support from neighbors and a letter of support from her next door
neighbor.
Commissioner
Thomas moved that ANC 1B support the application of Pica Taco for a new Retail
Class D Restaurant license.
Commissioner
Muhammad seconded the motion.
Commissioner
Raia asked if there was a voluntary agreement.
Commissioner
Thomas said no, there was no need for a voluntary agreement.
The motion
was adopted 7 yes, 0 no, 1 abstain.
Commissioner Raia abstained.
Yegna,
Commissioner
Raia said that the owner was not present, but she had appeared before the
Commission two months ago to seek support for the conversion of her license
from CR to CT. They do have a voluntary
agreement with the Commission.
Commissioner
Raia moved that ANC 1B support the application of Yegna to change its license
from Class C Restaurant to Class C Tavern, and that he be authorized to
negotiate changes in the voluntary agreement between Yegna and the Commission
to conform to their new business model.
Commissioner
Nadeau seconded the motion.
Commissioner
Nadeau asked if there were any concerns in the community about the change in
license in view of the incidents that have occurred on that block in the past
few years.
Commissioner
Raia said that he had attended the last Westminster Neighborhood Association
meeting, and no concerns were expressed.
The motion
was adopted unanimously, 8 yes, 0 no.
Liquor License Renewal Applications
Commissioner
Raia noted that there were numerous applications for liquor license
renewals. None of these applications
involved any change in the license and none were controversial.
Commissioner
Raia moved that ANC 1B support the applications for renewal of liquor licenses
for the following businesses:
Chuck & Bill Bison Lounge,
renewal of Retail Class C
Tavern License
Manchester Bar & Restaurant,
renewal of Retail Class C Tavern License
Etete Ethiopian Cuisine,
Retail Class C Tavern License
Solly’s U Street Tavern,
renewal of Retail Class C Tavern License
Nellie’s Restaurant & Sports Bar,
Renewal of Retail Class C Tavern
License
Dodge City,
of Retail Class C Tavern License
Lounge of
Retail Class C Tavern License
Tabaq,
C Tavern License
Pure Nightclub and Lounge,
Retail Class C Nightclub License
Twin Jazz,
retail
Class C Tavern License
Bar Pilar,
Class C Tavern License
Café Saint-Ex,
Class C Tavern License
Jin,
C Tavern License
Town,
C Nightclub license
Commissioner
Muhammad seconded the motion.
The motion
was adopted unanimously, 8 yes, 0 no.
DC 9,
Commissioner
Raia said there were concerns with DC 9 because of the recent incident
resulting in the death of a patron.
Commissioner
Raia moved that ANC 1B does not support DC 9’s application for renewal of its
Retail Class C Nightclub license.
Commissioner
Muhammad seconded the motion.
Commissioner
Nadeau asked if the motion was to protest the renewal or just not support it.
Commissioner
Raia said the motion was to not support the application,
Commissioner
Nadeau said that in that case the motion was not needed.
Chairperson
Anderson Holness and Commissioner Raia said that the intent was to get the Commission’s
non-support on the record.
Commissioner
Nadeau said that the motion in that form was meaningless to the Alcoholic
Beverage Regulatory Administration.
Chairperson
Anderson Holness said that it meant a lot to the Commission’s record and so the
motion would be accepted; whether or not they had to do it, they were going to
put it on record officially that the commission did not support the renewal.
The motion
was adopted 5 yes, 0 no, 3 abstain.
Commissioners Raia, Lopez and Nadeau abstained.
La Fonda, 2100 14th Street
N.W -- application for new Retail Class C Restaurant license --- Voluntary
Agreement and Withdrawal of Protest
Commissioner
Thomas reviewed the reasons for the Commission’s protest of this
application. She said that the voluntary
agreement had been negotiated and there was one additional amendment that had
to be added. That amendment could be put
on the record at this meeting. The
applicant had met with all of the neighborhood associations and resident
associations that were affected; they had also met with Martha’s Table and
Commissioner
Raia said he had not seen or reviewed the voluntary agreement. Commissioner Thomas said it had just been
completed today and it could be distributed to commissioners now for review.
Commissioner
Nadeau said that the voluntary agreement addressed issues related to noise, hours,
trash disposal, the daycare center next door, hours for an outdoor patio,
should the owner decide to apply for one.
Otherwise, it was a standard voluntary agreement.
Commissioner
Thomas said that the amendment that still needed to be added to the voluntary
agreement provided for soundproofing to mitigate possible disturbances to the
daycare center next door to the restaurant.
Commissioner
Thomas also noted that residents of Union Row disagreed with the closing time
for the outdoor patio and wanted it to close every night at 12 midnight rather
than closing at 1:00 AM on Friday and Saturday nights.
Ms. Leeann
Sadowski,
Commissioner
Nadeau noted that the patio was located on
Commissioner
Raia commented that there was no proof that an outdoor café or patio associated
with a bar or restaurant contributed in any way to the protection of citizens
from crime, so “eyes on the street” should not be taken into consideration when
negotiating the voluntary agreement.
Commissioner
Thomas observed that the residents and businesses on the affected block, as
well as the church and Martha’s Table, were all in support of the extended hour
for Friday and Saturday.
Commissioner
Raia observed that the closing hour for all days of the week for the patio
specified in the agreement was 12 midnight.
Commissioner
Thomas said that changing the closing hour to 1:00 AM for Fridays and Saturdays
was one of the amendments she wanted included in the motion she would make.
Commissioner
Thomas moved that ANC 1B approve the voluntary agreement between it and La
Fonda as amended to allow their outdoor patio to be open to 1:00 AM Friday and
Saturday nights, and that its protest of La Fonda’s application be withdrawn
when the voluntary agreement has been signed.
Commissioner
Nadeau seconded the motion.
The motion
was adopted, 7 yes, 1 no. Commissioner Raia
voted no.
Grant Applications and Grants
Committee Report
Commissioner
Akinmboni presented the report of the Grants Committee:
GRANTS
COMMITTEE REPORT
November
4, 2010
Commissioner Rosemary Akinmboni, Chairperson
The Committee met at 5:30 PM on
Tuesday, October 26, 2010 in the Commission office,
Committee members present: Commissioner Rosemary Akinmboni, Chairperson,
Commissioner Brianne Nadeau, Commissioner Juan Lopez, and Ms. Halima Roebuck.
Others attending: Ms.
Camille McKenzie, Columbia Heights-Shaw Family Collaborative, Mr. Mack
Thompson, Columbia Heights Village Tenants Association.
The committee
considered a request for $500 for the DC Winter Tournament of games to be held
on December 4. Commissioner Akinmboni explained the new rules to the members of
the community, focusing on the need to have the grant serving residents of the
1B community. Although this event takes place in 1A, it was noted that
participants will be from both 1A and 1B, as with the summer games. The venue
rotates between 1A and 1B and the 1A location was selected because it was
indoors and because of its proximity to both communities.
There will be five
youth helpers from the community, two judges, facilitators and a coordinator
(Mack Thompson). All those benefiting from the grant live in the
community. ANC1A is supporting this project with a grant of $500 and
there is a range of financial support from business to community organizations,
including the
Commissioner
Akinmboni moved that the committee support the grant in the amount of $500.
Commissioner Lopez seconded the motion. It was adopted unanimously, 4-0.
Grant application for $500.00 from the
Commissioner
Akinmboni moved that ANC 1B approve the application of the
Heights
Tenants Association for a grant of $500.00.
Commissioner
Muhammad seconded the motion.
The
motion was adopted, 7 yes, 1 no.
Commissioner Nadeau voted no.
Commissioner
Moss said she was submitting a grant application to the Grants Committee from
Inner Voices, Inc., which organizes an annual Christmas Day dinner for the
community. This project is greatly
assisted by businesses such as Town, the 930 Club and WPFW-FM.
New
Business
There was no
new business.
Community Events & Announcements
Commissioner
Muhammad announced the meeting of his single-member district on November 17 at
7 PM at
Chairperson
Anderson Holness announced that the Commission attempts to set its agenda a
month in advance, so people who have an issue they want to include on the
agenda should give notice the month before the meeting. Two weeks before the Commission meeting items
will not be added to the agenda, because by that time, the agenda for the next
meeting is already set. She asked that
anyone wanting an agenda item on the December meeting agenda contact Staff
Director Jim Irwin at the ANC office immediately.
Commissioner
Lopez announced that the problem with the crosswalk at 14th and Girard Streets
was finally resolved by DDOT with the installation of pedestrian pylons.
Commissioner
Akinmboni announced that D.C. Department of Employment Services was holding a
job fair in partnership with Comcast at the Naylor Road Career ?Service One
Stop Center, 2626 Naylor Road, on Monday, November 9, beginning at 10:30 AM.
Mr. John
Guggenmos, Town Nightclub, said that every Christmas they try to adopt a family
in the community to help with Christmas.
He asked commissioners to give him recommendations about deserving families. The weekend after
Andrea
Doughty, Arts District Branding Project, announced that there would be a presentation
of preliminary brand concepts for the Arts District at
Mr. James
Burrell, Prince Hall Masons, said that the Masons would be having their annual
Session on December 8, 9, 10. Visitors would be coming in from all over the
Chairperson
Anderson Holness said that the Prince Hall Masons had been very supportive of
the community and had been a stabilizing force in the community for many
years. In the past, the Commission had
supported their request. Chairperson
Anderson Holness said that she thought it would be the consensus of the
Commission to support their request and communicate that support. She asked the Commission if that was the
consensus.
Commissioner
Muhammad said that easement of parking enforcement was not going to happen.
Chairperson
Anderson Holness said that they were only asking for the Commission’s support.
Commissioner
Muhammad said that the reality was that DDOT was not going to do it, that
easement of enforcement was not going to happen, and that the people most
impacted by the request were the people living in that area. Parking was already a big issue for them. He did not think it was in anyone’s best
interest for the Commission to support this request.
Chairperson
Anderson Holness said that the Masons were asking for the Commission’s support
for what they do, and the Commission had supported what they do in the
past. The Prince Hall Masons were not
asking the Commission to support their request to DDOT. They were not asking the Commission for a
petition.
Commissioner
Muhammad said that Mr. Burrell did ask the Commission to support their petition
for relief of parking enforcement for those three days.
Chairperson
Anderson Holness asked Mr. Burrell to restate his request to the Commission.
Mr. Burrell
said they were asking for the Commission’s support. The petition was a separate activity.
Commissioner
Muhammad said he was stating for the record that he did not believe that the
Commission should support their request.
Chairperson
Anderson Holness said that, for the record, she wanted to clarify that they
were not asking the Commission to support, on the record or off the record,
their request for easement of parking enforcement. They were just verbally saying that the
Commission say that it supports what they do. Chairperson Anderson Holness said she did not
think that the Commission did not support what the Prince Hall Masons do. The Commission was not supporting the parking
request; they were not asking the Commission to support their parking
request. Chairperson Anderson Holness
thanked Mr. Burrell for coming and making his announcement.
Commissioner
Nadeau said that she felt the Prince Hall Masons should be asking for the
Commission’s support and the Commission should be working with the Masons to
notify the community of what was going on.
It had been an agenda item in past years and the Commission had voted on
it in past years. She felt that this
request had been sneaked in during the announcement period,
Commissioner
Raia said the request was not getting a lot of support so there was nothing to
vote on.
Chairperson
Anderson Holness said that they were not asking for the Commission’s support.
Commissioner
Nadeau said there should have been a request.
Chairperson
Anderson Holness said there had been no request, only an announcement.
Commissioner
Nadeau said that there should have been a request for the Commission’s support.
Chairperson
Anderson Holness asked Commissioner Nadeau what the Commission should do,
chastise the Masons?
Commissioner
Nadeau said no, the Commission should ask the Masons…..
Chairperson
Anderson Holness said this was an organization in the community like any other
organization. They did not ask the
Commission for anything; they simply came to make an announcement. Did Commissioner Nadeau think the Commission
should chastise them for making an announcement?
Commissioner
Nadeau said no, but the Commission should ask them in the future….
Chairperson
Anderson Holness said that the Commission did not have the authority to
chastise any organization that comes before it.
If the Masons did not ask the Commission for a vote, what is the
Commission to do? The Commission cannot
just vote because it wants to do…..
Commissioner
Nadeau said that any organization that does not come before the commission and
just goes on with its project is not following the process. Parking is included in the process. Parking is no small thing. It should come before the ANC.
Chairperson
Anderson Holness said the Masons did not bring it before the Commission. She asked Mr. Burrell to take back to his
organization the request that, in future, if they wanted the Commission to vote
on something, they should notify the Commission to have it on the agenda in a
timely manner.
Mr. Burrell
said he would do so.
There being
no further business, Commissioner Muhammad moved that the meeting be adjourned.
Commissioner
Nadeau seconded the motion.
The motion
was adopted unanimously.
The
November, 2010 meeting of ANC 1B was adjourned at 8:57 PM.